<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing order into the bookmark chaos - Linkagogo, Furl and Google Search History</title>
	<link>http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/42</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/42#comment-765</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/42#comment-765</guid>
					<description>Your Firefox plugin won't work in Opera, but Opera can be configured to perform any searches you want (for an example, see http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/3)

In Opera I have my searches setup so that I just type &quot;l something&quot; in the address bar to search linkagogo for &quot;something&quot; or &quot;f something&quot; to search for it in furl. The important thing here is &quot;What do I search for?&quot;. For linkagogo I would have to recall some of the words from the site/page name or one of the tags, while for furl I can put in *any* word that associates me to that page since furl stores and indexes whole pages for me, not just the title/link. 

In brief, both linkagogo and furl can be searched extremelly fast, but furl makes it easier to think of the search phrase to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Your Firefox plugin won&#8217;t work in Opera, but Opera can be configured to perform any searches you want (for an example, see <a href='http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/3' rel='nofollow'>http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/3</a>)</p>
	<p>In Opera I have my searches setup so that I just type &#8220;l something&#8221; in the address bar to search linkagogo for &#8220;something&#8221; or &#8220;f something&#8221; to search for it in furl. The important thing here is &#8220;What do I search for?&#8221;. For linkagogo I would have to recall some of the words from the site/page name or one of the tags, while for furl I can put in *any* word that associates me to that page since furl stores and indexes whole pages for me, not just the title/link. </p>
	<p>In brief, both linkagogo and furl can be searched extremelly fast, but furl makes it easier to think of the search phrase to use.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/42#comment-764</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.broobles.com/blog/posts/42#comment-764</guid>
					<description>Some nice insite here. I'll have to give Furl a try sounds interesting. Stumbled upon your blog in a search involving linkagogo, which I'm alsoa big fan of. My bookmarks have hit the &amp;#62;2000 level.
Maybe I'll try crimping that down too, but, what a job!! I can find stuf fast so am not too bothered.
You use Opera.. hmm.. is that Mozilla?.. Would my beta Firefox search plugin (see my website) work on Opera? :)
Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Some nice insite here. I&#8217;ll have to give Furl a try sounds interesting. Stumbled upon your blog in a search involving linkagogo, which I&#8217;m alsoa big fan of. My bookmarks have hit the &gt;2000 level.<br />
Maybe I&#8217;ll try crimping that down too, but, what a job!! I can find stuf fast so am not too bothered.<br />
You use Opera.. hmm.. is that Mozilla?.. Would my beta Firefox search plugin (see my website) work on Opera? <img src='http://www.broobles.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Peace.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
